I hope you wouldn't either? That depends on where the cameras are and do they have a warrant. If the camera is on public location and is directed to shoot the streets and not to people's homes, then they are not considered invasion of privacy. If the camera-operatoris an agent of police and has a warrant to pry a private home, then the prying is an agent of police and has a warrant to pry a private home, then the prying is part of an ongoing investigation and must aim to a legal action to catch acriminal.
The things that are recorded are not made public. Furthermore, there's no need for you to go to that public place, where the cameras are located. If you don't want to be filmed go somewhere else. The cameras don't invade privacy because they are mostly put in public places. Well how could one expect to have privacy out in public? Its called the public because, it's not private and its out in the open where everyone is free to be.
Honestly, the only time i'm worried about cameras is when i'm doing something naughty or unusual. If you do not want the government seeing something that you're doing, then you probably should not be doing it. There are many probable causes as to why they feel need to watch us. Think logically, why would the government would otherwise watch the American people?
The governmental body has better things to do with their life. Don't just automatically assume that everything the contains the word 'government' is bad. That is not the case. Open your mind to the facts and realize that there are many good reasons why they would be compelled to monitor us. Just one example would be the following: I think it okay. The world is more safer to me with cameras.
It not invading anything to me unless there in your house which I haven't heard of until I read the yes comments. But most of these cameras are in public areas were people can see them. So I see no problem. So they are not invading privacy they are just trying to protect people from crimes being committed. Because if a crime was comitted they would have it on tape and it would help to catch the person or did it.
As long as the law enforcement cameras are placed within public places then no they do not invade the privacy of citizens. I do not do anything in public that I wouldn't want law enforcement to see anyways so knowing that I am on camera would not disturb me in the least.
Putting them in private property is another matter. Sign In Sign Up. Add a New Topic. Do law enforcement cameras invade the privacy of citizens? New to Old Created: Old to New Likes: Most to Least Likes: Least to Most Replies: Most to Least Replies: This is right I think this is right because they are everywhere even in my home it is horrible because you cant do anything but nothing I just need a little bit more words to say because I don't know what to say I mean I am only 14 so you know whats goin on Report Post.
Safety for the public The only reason lake enforcement cameras are around are for the safety of you, the public, and the officers. Related Opinions Does marijuana's ease of production render law enforcement efforts useless?
Should local police agencies use drones for law enforcement? Do you believe adding an enforcement arm to the ICC would be helpful? Do you think civilization can survive without active police forces to enforce laws? Would decriminalization benefit law enforcement? Are law enforcement cameras an invasion of privacy? Are environmental law enforcements unjust?
Does law enforcement invade our privacy when they use cameras? Nationwide, violent crimes are down 5. Crimes like murder declined 7. Law enforcement officials say the increased use of high-tech tools to fight crime is a big reason why. From the operations center of the Office of Emergency Communications in Chicago "48 Hours" correspondent Erin Moriarty reports officials keep watch over the square mile urban area with a massive network of cameras, creating a virtual eye in the sky.
Officials refuse to give actual figures, but some estimate the number of publicly and privately owned cameras targeting Chicago to be around 15, Nick Benton, a Chicago paramedic assigned to the operation center, said they can "Zoom in up to 32 times optically, and up to times digitally.
I'm not going to pull up a specific license plate," he added. We will never look into buildings and we are actually very careful if we zoom in on people's faces specifically.
Jim Harper of the Cato Institute says the problem with surveillance cameras and technology is they have a spotty record of preventing crime. Instead, he says they are an invasion of privacy. People in most cities are probably captured on cameras daily, if not multiple times a day," Harper said. Harper says the danger is when videos are released of individuals who are not actually involved in a crime. Remember the nationally broadcast video of a man changing his shirt - because officials first believed he could be the Times Square bomber.
But there is likely to be a demand for even more surveillance cameras. Officials say the solution then is ever more sophisticated equipment that catches criminals in the act. So when an operator received a call that a Salvation Army bell ringer was helping himself to the collection bucket - the cops were called in.
The brain of the video surveillance system is computer software called "analytics. Once someone or something crosses a virtual line the computer sends an alert to an official on-duty. Chicago Police commander John Lewin runs the information services department. He points to mobile cameras called PODS police operation devices which allows officers to watch high crime neighborhoods in real time.
Using these PODS, police were able to catch one man as he attempted to burglarize a home. Moriarty asked, "Are you concerned that officers will rely too much on technology and not do the regular foot work? They are just going to be another tool in the toolbox to help officers do their jobs. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches. Americans will soon have to decide when this goes too far. Share Tweet Reddit Flipboard Email.
City officials were keeping a close eye on crowds gathering for a Tea Party protest. Can you pick out faces of those at the demonstration? Where America Stands "There are no absolutes here," Harper said.
Erin Moriarty Correspondent, "48 Hours". More Evening News Couple's love story started with a CPR kiss "That first kiss being CPR was obviously very magical because here I am and im very grateful that I'm able to experience further kisses" year-old girl won't let cancer keep her off the dance floor "I just kind of push myself," Ava Blaser said. Hurricane Florence's onslaught begins views. Dallas police accused of smearing man killed by cop in his own home views. Storm chaser describes Florence's wrath views.
Utility responds after deadly gas explosions rock Massachusetts views.
Yes law enforcement cameras invade the privacy of citizens The problem isn't so much the laws, but rather it's the arbitrary way they are enforced that is the issue with some of this, not to mention the "suspicion" of committing a crime vs. actual crime.
Law enforcement officials say the increased use of high-tech tools to fight crime is a big reason why. From the operations center of the Office of Emergency Communications in Chicago "48 Hours" correspondent Erin Moriarty reports officials keep watch over the square mile urban area with a massive network of cameras, creating a virtual eye in the sky.
LOS ANGELES — Officers at thousands of law enforcement agencies are wearing tiny cameras to record their interactions with the public, but in many cases the devices are being rolled out faster than departments are able to create policies to govern their use. Yes law enforcement cameras are an invasion of privacy. Bush had said it himself quote on quote "The constitution Is a goddamned piece of paper" He didn't even denied it nor has he ever. was a poor excuse to put this big brother law on the people.
Are law enforcement cameras an invasion of privacy? Introduction The past decade has seen a proliferation of security cameras in public places. According to the Security Industry Association, a trade group, surveillance cameras in the U.S. number in the millions. Cameras placed on the streets or in public places, are an invasion of our privacy. We don’t need cameras watching us at all times. We need our own times to be alone to .